
Showing posts with label karl gnass. Show all posts
Showing posts with label karl gnass. Show all posts
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Karl Gnass - Wednesday/Thursday

This is a mix of drawings between Wednesday and Thursday night with Karl. My MTV movie was over and I actually was able to be in class the full amount of time.
I struggled a lot with this hat and the collar of this dress.

Monday, January 31, 2011
Drawing the Draped Figure - Wednesday
I feel like I've lost a few steps with my drawing. I have been so tired by the time I get to this Draped Figure Class I don't even know what I really have inside of me. But maybe it will change this week when I don't have to work on the MTV movie anymore. Sometimes I wonder why I bother learning how to draw the figure. I feel like maybe I should just do feel good more abstract works.
I know I'm adding more faces which I think is an improvement. I know I have to work on shoes they just confuse the hell out of me.

Sunday, January 23, 2011
Draped Figure - Class 4
On Wednesday I got to class an hour and a half late and I missed the lesson about the suit. I never felt comfortable drawing. I also missed Thursday because of the SDSA meeting. I'm not getting to this draped figure class as much as I thought I would. I never thought I would be working right now that's why I signed up for it. I did hear Karl say "give up some characteristics of the folds for the sense of character . . . the garment should speak clearly and be part of the story."


Draped Figure - Class 3
Draped Figure - Class 1
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Gladiator Workshop - Karl Gnass - "Try Something that Turns Your Fork into Chopsticks"
Linda and I went to Karl Gnass's Gladiator workshop again this year. I can't believe a whole year has passed. I felt like he talked about different things this year the last year. I will have to check my notes maybe I just didn't remember what he said last year.
This is a work sheet he handed out in class. He really stressed drawing the two figures as one. Not doing them as cookies on a sheet.

Here are my notes:
Drawing 2 figures doesn't mean they are separate. You need to think about them as if they are one. Don't Figure one figure out and then the next - they need to integrate. Integratre lines of action. Integrate lone lines of expression. You need to draw energy. You need to figure out what the story is.
Relationship! Feeling! Synergy! Think about the point counterpoint. Ask yourself what the story is. Axis. Revolving. Ask yourself what is going on.
What is your point of view? What is the mood? What is the style?
We don't want decals. What are these gladiators telling me? What do they want to express?
Don't get lost in the buckles and rivets. If you start figure out the buckles and rivets too soon you are lost. Indicate the story elements. Because without the story we miss the boat. You need a good concise story. Try not to be subtroverted too fast. Think about composition. Break apart you habitual procedures. Try something that turns your fork into chopsticks!
Think : up-down, left-right, forward-back. If one head is tipped toward maybe the other is tipped away. Remember to create out of your head and not to rely totally on the model. Open up your imagination. Need to know the two figures are responding to each others' moves. You are not obliged to repeat what you see.
Simple Shapes. Simple ideas. Rendering is not the story. Grapple with long lines and how they relate to each other.
Think of Cezanne as he considered the whole picture. He did not just place objects.
Everything is related to the frame. A cookie sheet is more interesting if one cookie has a bite taken out of it.
In Western Art we enter the frame from the lower left. Large against small is another strategy. One is responsible for every square inch in a picture not just the subject.
There is music in the visual experience. Nothing is accidental. Every mark has a reason. Finally, it is about orchestrating a whole movement. Once you put your figures in a frame every quadrant is important. Good design is important - but good design doesn't necessarily tell a story. Good design strikes the eye. Good design doesn't mean there is a pay off.
A picture wants a graphic sense and a pay off. The impressionists did that.
This is a work sheet he handed out in class. He really stressed drawing the two figures as one. Not doing them as cookies on a sheet.

Here are my notes:
Drawing 2 figures doesn't mean they are separate. You need to think about them as if they are one. Don't Figure one figure out and then the next - they need to integrate. Integratre lines of action. Integrate lone lines of expression. You need to draw energy. You need to figure out what the story is.





Remember a battle is more about strategy than swords clanking.
Remember to take care of the ground plane and really decide where the legs are going to be.
Don't get lost in swords and rivets - but remember hands and feet can be very important. Draw what they are wearing as it relates on figure to another.

Think of Cezanne as he considered the whole picture. He did not just place objects.



A picture wants a graphic sense and a pay off. The impressionists did that.
Labels:
2 figure composition,
costume drawing,
karl gnass
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)